I just noticed that someone reached my blog by clicking on a link at groklaw.net, suggesting that the main page of Groklaw had a link to this blog.
I just paid a visit to Groklaw, and learned it was true. I have been grokked!
As I write this, the “Groklaw Latest News Picks” has as its first entry:
I used one of the new OLPC machines last week while attending the K12 Open Minds Conference for 2007 (k12openminds07) that was held last week in Indianapolis, Indiana.
While I used the machine for only a few minutes, I came away very impressed by it, in part because of my recent thinking about the growing importance of open-source to education, and the shared sense of adventure and hope that I found at the conference….
I have been waiting for close to three decades to see an application of computer technology to improve education that was comparable to PLATO in its potential impact.
I finally think the search has ended. That would be last week, when I first had a chance to use a real OLPC….Though OLPC is still in its early days, I do think it will not fail, and that it will prove to be an enormous success.-
Dave Shields,The Wayward Word Press
Goodness, gracious. I have been grokked — by Pamela Jones, the one and only “PJ.” What an honor!
So let me send a few grok’s back to PJ.
I started in my current job helping to manage IBM’s open-source activities in early February, 2003.
Just over a month later I saw an article in one of the Linux news sites that a small company called “SCO” had filed a suit against IBM. I then sent a note some colleagues.
A few months later I noticed the appearance of the Groklaw site, and I have followed it religiously ever since. For example, I recall that when I went to Toronto in August to celebrate my aunt’s 80th birthday, I didn’t take along my laptop, and so had access to the internet only via a machine in a motel lobby, and Groklaw was one of the three or four sites I visited to see what was up.
I know that I was not alone in using Groklaw, and I’ve been told that many IBM attorneys were frequent visitors. I expect that was also the case for the attorneys working for the Dark Side.
I have continued to follow the site quite closely, though now that SCO seems doomed to extinction — the latest news being that SCO might be bought for Wall Street pocket change — I follow Groklaw less closely, but I still visit it at least once every two days.
I have given several talks on open-source these past years, and I have made mention of Groklaw of many of the, as an example of the use of the open-source development model. 
I find Groklaw a notable example of the open-source development model and culture in that it uses all the same principles, and has the same culture, as the most successful open-source projects. Groklaw differs from Apache only in that its community releases information and not source code. Otherwise it’s all there: release early, release often; a central web site; a way for anyone to contribute by posting a comment; an army of core volunteers who contribute by attending court sessions, taking notes, and sending them back to PJ for review and posting; a very well-designed web site; frequent news updates; and so forth.
Groklaw has an exceptional leader. All I know about PJ is what I have read about her. I understand she is about my age (I’m in the my early 60’s); she is a paralegal, not an attorney; she started this project on her own initiative; and lives in Westchester County, as do I, though I don’t know where.
She has put an extraordinary amount of effort into this project, and to my knowledge has done all the work on her own time and her own dime, making her a fellow volunteer, though she works in amassing and sharing information about open-source legal issues, while I work in promoting the use of open-source in education.
She is a wonderful writer, just wonderful. She has a clear voice, a great sense of humor, and many of her posts show both hard work and detailed scholarship.
PJ is a great educator. I have gained a much deeper appreciation of the law, and of the people who devote their careers to it, by following Groklaw .
Yes, PJ takes pot shots at the business folks involved, as I also take pot shots at Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer because they are not members of the open-source community. But she does not take pot shots at the legal folks.
Her respect for the law is evident whenever she writes about it. She treats both sides fairly and treats with equal respect the attorneys, judges, and court employees.
Most stories about the law –whether fiction on nonfiction — are about criminal cases. The only detailed, accessible, and well-written of a civil suit I can recall is A Civil Action.
My guess is that in the years — and perhaps even decades — to come, much of her writing, as well as that of the many contributors to Groklaw , will be frequently cited in introductory courses in law schools, and SCO v. IBM will be frequently used as a case study because of the immense amount of information that has been compiled about it.
Moreover, all that information has been published on the internet and is available at no cost.
This case is unique in that it was about open-source. PJ started alone, but she made the key decision to follow the open-source model, publishing everything and welcoming contributors. She was thus able to assemble a team that used the internet to collect the information that in part helped to defeat an attack on both open-source and the internet itself.
I do not think we see its like again.
Some may argue that the folks in Redmond may have a different view.
But I have another view, one that I must state is just my own personal view, since I happen to work for IBM.
I’m sure Groklaw played a role in the outcome of the suit, in that we all know attorneys on both sides were both reading it and using every shred of information they could on the site to help their cause, or to ward off an attach.
However, the real contribution of the Groklaw team has been to provide an immense amount of education about open-source, licensing, copyright, associated legal issues, and so forth.
That education has made many more people comfortable with open-source, thus making them less susceptible to over-the-top attacks such as “open-source is a cancer.”
Perhaps the most valuable part of this education has been to demonstrate the open-source model at work, relentlessly applied day after day, with no member of the community taking advantage of another.
I think that Groklaw as an open-source project is unique in that –as best I can tell — it has been done without the use of any email lists, but as dispatches from the field to a central editor who publishes as much as is deemed fit.
All this has been done completely in the open, so the results of this education will always be available.
I thank PJ and the team for all their great work.
We all should.